top of page
TERRALogo.webp

Navigating the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) for Property Developers: A Comprehensive Guide

  • Writer: TERRA
    TERRA
  • Jun 26
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 6

Property development in Massachusetts often involves navigating complex environmental regulations, particularly when dealing with potentially contaminated sites. The Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) provides the regulatory framework for addressing oil and hazardous material releases, but understanding its requirements and procedures can be challenging for developers. This comprehensive guide breaks down the MCP process and explains how property developers can successfully navigate these regulations to keep projects on track.


Understanding the Massachusetts Contingency Plan

The Massachusetts Contingency Plan, codified at 310 CMR 40.0000, is the state's comprehensive regulation governing the assessment and cleanup of contaminated sites. Implemented in 1993, the MCP established a privatized cleanup program that allows Licensed Site Professionals (LSPs) to oversee environmental remediation on behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP).

Key Features of the MCP:

  • Privatized oversight through Licensed Site Professionals

  • Risk-based cleanup standards

  • Streamlined regulatory processes

  • Flexibility in remediation approaches

  • Clear timelines and requirements


When Does the MCP Apply to Your Development?

Property developers encounter MCP requirements in several scenarios:

Common Triggers:

  • Discovery of contamination during due diligence

  • Historical industrial or commercial land uses

  • Underground storage tank removals

  • Soil and groundwater impacts from spills

  • Vapor intrusion concerns

  • Brownfield redevelopment projects


Mandatory Reporting Thresholds: Developers must report to MassDEP when contamination exceeds specific thresholds, including:

  • Spills of 10+ gallons of petroleum products

  • Any release creating a sheen on surface water

  • Contamination reaching drinking water wells

  • Discovery of floating petroleum products on groundwater


Key MCP Requirements for Developers

Licensed Site Professional Oversight

All MCP activities require LSP oversight. Your LSP serves as:

  • Technical expert and project manager

  • Regulatory liaison with MassDEP

  • Compliance certifier

  • Risk assessment specialist

Choosing the Right LSP:

  • Verify current license status

  • Review relevant project experience

  • Evaluate technical expertise

  • Assess regulatory relationships

Reporting and Documentation

The MCP requires specific submittals and timelines:

Critical Deadlines:

  • 2-hour reporting: Immediate hazards and large releases

  • 72-hour reporting: Reportable concentrations in drinking water

  • 120 days: Completion of Phase I Initial Site Investigation

  • 3 years: Completion of comprehensive response actions

Required Submittals:

  • Release Tracking Number (RTN) application

  • Phase I through Phase V reports

  • Remedial Action Plans

  • Public involvement plans

  • Permanent Solution Statements

Financial Assurance and Liability

Liability Considerations:

  • Joint and several liability for responsible parties

  • Potential third-party claims

  • Long-term stewardship obligations

  • Insurance coverage requirements

Cost Planning: Budget for comprehensive environmental costs including:

  • LSP oversight and reporting

  • Site investigation and monitoring

  • Remediation implementation

  • Long-term maintenance

  • Regulatory review fees


Developer Strategies for MCP Compliance

Early Environmental Due Diligence

Pre-Acquisition Assessment:

  • Conduct thorough Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

  • Review historical records and aerial photographs

  • Identify potential contamination sources

  • Evaluate regulatory compliance history

Risk Evaluation:

  • Assess cleanup costs and timelines

  • Evaluate development timeline impacts

  • Consider alternative remediation approaches

  • Plan for contingency scenarios


Project Integration and Timing

Construction Coordination:

  • Integrate environmental work with construction schedules

  • Plan for soil management and disposal

  • Coordinate utility installations with remediation

  • Schedule monitoring well installation strategically

Phased Development Approaches:

  • Prioritize clean areas for immediate development

  • Phase contaminated area cleanup with construction

  • Implement interim measures for protection

  • Plan long-term monitoring integration


Stakeholder Communication

Community Engagement:

  • Develop public involvement plans early

  • Communicate environmental progress transparently

  • Address community concerns proactively

  • Coordinate with local officials

Regulatory Relationships:

  • Maintain open communication with MassDEP

  • Provide timely submittals and responses

  • Address regulatory comments constructively

  • Plan for inspection and review periods


Common MCP Challenges and Solutions

Timeline Management

Challenge: Environmental cleanup timelines conflicting with development schedules Solution: Early engagement, parallel processing, and contingency planning

Cost Control

Challenge: Unexpected contamination discoveries increasing project costs

Solution: Comprehensive due diligence, contingency budgeting, and phased approaches

Regulatory Complexity

Challenge: Navigating complex MCP requirements and deadlines

Solution: Experienced LSP partnership and proactive regulatory communication

Technical Implementation

Challenge: Integrating remediation with development infrastructure

Solution: Early coordination between environmental and engineering teams


Emerging Trends and Considerations

PFAS Contamination

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are increasingly detected at development sites, requiring:

  • Specialized sampling and analysis

  • Evolving regulatory requirements

  • Advanced treatment technologies

  • Long-term monitoring considerations

Climate Resilience

Climate change impacts on contaminated sites require consideration of:

  • Sea level rise and flood risks

  • Extreme weather event planning

  • Remediation system resilience

  • Long-term effectiveness evaluation

Technology Integration

New technologies are improving MCP compliance through:

  • Real-time monitoring systems

  • Advanced remediation techniques

  • Digital documentation and reporting

  • Automated compliance tracking


TERRA Environmental's Licensed Site Professionals bring decades of experience helping property developers successfully navigate the MCP process throughout Massachusetts. Our comprehensive approach ensures your development projects move forward efficiently while maintaining full regulatory compliance.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page